Thursday, February 20, 2020

CNN Iran Nuclear Talk #2


"Someday, and it won't be too long in the future something is going to force someones hand. It could be a major siting. It could be a major leak. Something. Something that can no longer be denied."--Richard Dolan

Coincidently, for me on July 14th I was off work so I spent most of the day watching Christianne repeatedly seem to change form.  At 10:48 Austria Vienna time Christianne returns to be interviewed again by Christine Romans. In both interviews she is positioned in front of the Palais Coburg hotel. In the second interview she is positioned off center and more to the right. Also positioned higher to the roof line. Missing is the pink ribbon around her neck. Her hands are still having a problem looking normal. They are black at times.



Several times throughout both interviews Christianne uses her hand to brush her hair away from her face. The video does indicate there was a breeze blowing. There are some kind of drapes on the balcony and I can see them moving as if there is a breeze. This indicates that she is doing the interview outside and not in a studio with a back drop of the hotel, or if she is in a studio with a back drop she has a fan blowing on her.



For some reason she prefers to use her right hand to brush her hair back on her left side of her face. Shown here in interview two and below in interview one. Is she intentionally doing this to show viewers her hand is a normal hand?



At time point 10:49 she raises her hand and it looks like this.



Why doesn't the skin color of her hand match the skin color on her face? Two frames before it is completely out of focus.



Why should her hand even be out of focus? It isn't moving all that fast. The cameras used by CNN cost around $30K. I'm sure my iPhone would take a clearer image. The hand position above is a common pose that Christianne uses while she talks. I found numerous images on the internet displaying this.


Why? Who knows. Her teeth also remained a problem for her in the second interview. Shown below you can see the image of a single tooth on the bottom. What is the explanation for this?


 Can it get any stranger? Yes it can. At the end of the video something flies over Christianne's shoulder. My first thought was a bug. My second thought was that must be the biggest bug ever to make its way onto a news broadcast. I don't know the distance that Christianne is from the hotel but looking at images I'm assuming around 35' or more. A flying insect wouldn't even be noticeable, would it? Staged media shown in the photo below indicating at least 35 or more feet. Could you see a drangonfly or moth fly next to the hotel building from that distance?













What kind of insect has a human type body with arms at the shoulders and wings attached? And does the illustrious Palais Coburg hotel who is housing world leaders know they have a giant bug infiltration? All of these cameras appear to be located right next to the building shown above. Did they record it? Yes, but did they see it? No.





I have contacted two entomologists at two different universities and asked them to help me identify this flying thing. One of them is currently looking at the video. I've also tried contacting CNN for an explanation into all of this. No reply. Was the entire broadcast hacked? If so why only alter Christianne? Why not the other reporters interviewed? Why not Christine Romans? Who has the technology to hack a live news feed where all time points synch up from Austria to Atlanta and into my home with no delay in the feed? And, if they were hacked why wouldn't CNN report it? Isn't that news worthy?

CNN claims they have a worldwide viewership between 90-166 million so why hasn't it ever made it onto the internet until now? Am I the only soul on the planet who has this--who has seen it? If it was hacked am I to believe it was only hacked for me, for my viewing pleasure? A far fetched thought, but I have entertained it.  Anything remotely strange ends up on youtube, so why hasn't this? Isn't it strange enough?

If it wasn't hacked and altered, and is real then what? Where do we take our thoughts for an explanation? Bad lighting? Camera distortion? Another life form mimicking a human? The interview was done outside in the early morning so I doubt there was any lighting at all. The camera's used cost around $30K a piece and record perfectly in HD, so I doubt that the camera's were capable of adding a distorted hand / distorted teeth onto a person.

Since the mid 90's there is a man named David Icke who claims there are beings here who aren't human. He claims these beings can and are mimicking human life. Is this what we are looking at? Did CNN unintentionally just give humanity a glimpse into other life forms--alien disclosure perhaps?

Maybe there's a simple way to determine if the broadcast was hacked. I'm sure CNN has all of their shows saved and archived, so all they have to do is pull the broadcast so that a comparison can be done to the one I have. If her hands and teeth remain human and completely in focus at all times we can then lean towards the show being hacked--something I'd think they'd be very concerned about. If it matches mine however than I think humanity has something to be very concerned about.



Entomologist update: Two entomologists looked at the video but neither could positively identify what it is. Both said possible dragonfly because of the thick body formation. I've looked at numerous videos on youtube of dragonflies flying and they don't have arms with wings attached, nor do they reach out and pull down to propel themselves. It remains a mystery.




No comments:

Post a Comment